Monday, May 20, 2019
Abstract Information Is a broad marches that encompasses a across-the-board variety of sources. In Information as Thing, backhand shot attempts to define Information by recess It down into culture-as-process, information-as-knowledge, and information-as-thing. As he went on into tangibility versus intangibility, I saw a mere glance of the complexity behind it all in all but what really got me thinking was the discussion of what is usually thought of to be informative.The field of information sciences restricts information to consist strictly of data, documents and text, when in reality, like Backhand said, aspirations and all the samets quite mayhap could provide more Information. Luckily, there atomic number 18 changes being make In order to see that artifacts and objects push aside be seen as documents. Another view operate introduced was the fact that anything could subscribe to the capacity to be informational, as bulky as someone wanted it to be. Furthermore, not a ll things seen as informative are going to be utilized.Backhand has opened my eyes to a new world where information is not hardly a term that is uncomplicated but is elaborate. An uncommon Approach Information is a broad but loaded term. With that said, it is dreadfully hard to pinpoint its exact meaning. Many uncommon but noteworthy viewpoints were discussed in Michael Backhands Information as Thing. This enlightening article presents a refreshing new twist on the way the leger information is defined. For me, personally, Information has always been a term that has been Incredibly simple and straightforward.It was something self explanatory?no further explanation required. Because Backhands perspective is so drastically different to what Im familiar with, I had to read this instal several times before I could even begin to empowered it. Before I could even grasp all the material covered in this article, I knew I was in for a grating ride. It quickly became clear to me that info rmation was exceedingly more complicated than I perceived It to be. As I was skimming through the article for the first time, I wondered what approach Backhand would take to define this term. Laming the sacred scripture Information to be am sorryuous, Backhand decided to break it down into three distinguishable parts information-as-process, information-as-knowledge, and information-as-thing. Moreover, he then separated them into tangible versus intangible, where information-as-process and information-as-knowledge are categorized as intangible, as opposed to Information-as-thing, which falls beneath the category of tangible. Since this was all still very(prenominal) foreign to me, my brain was feeling a little overwhelmed.I would have never have expected there to be so much gray area within information and information sciences. When I think of sources of information, the typical few immediately come to mind ?TV, books, and websites. As Backhand begins to introduce the various typ es of information, data, texts, and documents are among the first elements to be touched upon. While reading this, I was completely satisfied with those three resources. Topic. To my utter surprise, this was certainly not the case. Instead, my eyes settled on other italicized word that appeared at the break of the paragraph. Objects, the paper stated. I was puzzled by this label and questioned Backhands ideas but in brief came to the realization that he was spot on. Objects are decidedly a great source of information?some may even argue that they are more informative than ATA, texts, or documents?but are frequently overlooked in the world of information studies. As I mulled over the thought some more, a certain object make its way into my mind. My charm bracelet, something I wear everyday, undeniably allows others to peer into the career of Chelsea Chin. Each charm is highly symbolic and reveals a little snippet ab come forth me.In my opinion, if a public opinion poll was take n about types of information, Im sure the majority of stack would have responded with at least one, if not all, of the big three, but if they were given the time to actually think about it and then given n follow-up assignment, I am confident that most people would have a list with the word object nested somewhere in there. With regards to the way the field of information science has fixated their time on data, text, and documents while ignoring objects, it is definitely difficult to hear but pleasant to see Outlet and the documentation movement giving it more attention.As I think the section is starting to wrap up, I am shocked yet again as I come across another italicized word Events. Backhand brings up an excellent point when he refers to events as informative henchmen. There is no doubt that events are informative?they are Just harder to represent because they are fleeting. Backhand has come to the conclusion that we are unable to say confidently of anything that it could not be information (Backhand, 1991). The statement is valid but something Vive never really thought about. As we clop deeper into the article, it becomes apparent that there is really no solution to this problem.Take a desk for example. It is something that is often seen simply Just as a piece of furniture? nothing more, nothing less. If one really wanted to though, this desk could provide all sorts of information. It has the ability to imply that one was a student or held a job. Furthermore, the quality of the desk could also be something to look out for when examining the item if one is writing a review for the company that made it. From this example, it is booming to see that anything can be qualified as informational if placed into the correct situation, which is exactly the point Backhand is trying to get at.Sometimes people believe things are informational even when it is not assured hat people will utilize that thing. Just like the telephone book mentioned by Backhand, the term s of agreement is mass informational, but no one really takes the time to read through that novel. Information has always been very black and white to me. Reading this article, however, has allowed me to see information in a different light. Backhand made an exceptional attempt to define the word information by dividing it further into three separate sections.Comparing his definition to mine, it is easy to see that my view was elementary and extremely transparent while his was well thought out and intricate. His arguments have really provoked a considerable amount thought in me documents, data, and text are not the only resources that provide information. Objects and events are equally as informational, if not more so. Everything has to the Backhand made some really great points that have given me a newfound appreciation for the field of information studies. References Backhand, M. (1991). Information as Thing. Journal of the American Society for Information science, 42(5), 351-360 .
Posted by r at 9:52 AM